Multipoint Estimating is a technique used to estimate cost or duration by applying an average or weighted average of three inputs: an optimistic, a most likely, and a pessimistic estimate. This approach accounts for uncertainty and variability, making it more reliable than single-point estimates in environments where outcomes are not guaranteed.
Purpose and Characteristics
- Models Uncertainty – Captures the range of possible outcomes instead of a fixed value.
- Improves Accuracy – Produces more realistic expectations using weighted calculations.
- Inputs Variability – Considers best-case, worst-case, and expected-case scenarios.
- Feeds Risk Analysis – Commonly used in Monte Carlo simulations and contingency planning.
Common Formula (PERT Estimate)
The most common implementation is the Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) estimate:
Where:
- O = Optimistic estimate
- M = Most likely estimate
- P = Pessimistic estimate
- E = Expected estimate
Example Scenario
A task might take 3 days if everything goes well (optimistic), 5 days under normal conditions (most likely), and 10 days if issues arise (pessimistic). The weighted estimate would be:
Mermaid Diagram: Multipoint Estimating Flow
flowchart LR A[Optimistic Estimate] --> D[Weighted Formula] B[Most Likely Estimate] --> D C[Pessimistic Estimate] --> D D --> E[Expected Duration or Cost]
This structure shows how three inputs feed into a weighted calculation, resulting in a more reliable output.
Why Multipoint Estimating Matters
- Reduces Risk of Under/Overestimation – By considering a range, it’s harder to be blindsided.
- Builds Confidence – Provides a stronger basis for forecasts and planning decisions.
- Enables Smarter Contingency Planning – Helps determine appropriate buffers or reserves.
See also: Three-Point Estimating, Most Likely Duration, Optimistic Duration, Pessimistic Duration, PERT, Monte Carlo Simulation.